Book titleNeither physics nor fiction Read all about Gravimotion! Available now, a click away on your right. Book PublisherAmerican Book PublishingOn February 2 2010, the publisher gave noticed to the author that they've "gone out of print on" his title, for lack of sales. That allowed the author to offer the book free of charge through internet download. It turns out that the book has now quite a success, 105 downloads the first month! AuthorFor your information the author is not a physicist!Henri salles Gravimotion in the professional pressGravimotion's idea cannot be submitted to journals of physics as not worthy of physics own self-image. As an example see Wikipedia controversy below.Professional physicists simply disregard non-mathematical theories. In the professional press anything, which doesn't stick to main stream physics, yet claims to represent Nature, is stray ideas and disregarded. Gravimotion belongs to this category that is rejected by the media (so far at time of writing Jan 2009)! Gravimotion on Internet"Gravimotion.info" website (this site) offers only an introduction to the Gravimotion interpretation of Nature.Gravimotion's site has nevertheless some success. A counter has been installed on the site on August 10 2007. Since this date thousands have visited the site. The visitors are from all over the English-speaking world. 50% of the visits come from the USA. Visits from universities are not uncommon, even from other technical governmental organizations such as NASA.
History of GravimotionIn January 2001, the idea of Gravimotion appeared in the mind of the author while flying from San Francisco to Paris.Thanks to web.archive.org, you can go back and consult earlier thoughts, click on: web.archive.org And again thanks to web.archive.org, you can go back and consult more recent thoughts, click on: web.archive.org Gravimotion controversy on WikipediaIn January 2007, the inventor of Gravimotion posted an article titled "Gravimotion" on Wikipedia.The content of the article was a very short introduction to the idea of gravimoition. In May of 2007, Wikipedia's crew discovered it and immediately asked for deletion. The inventor tried to fight the deletion, to no avail. The gravimotion idea, not in line with conventional physics, and as such not endorsed by a single physicist so far, has been judged not worthy of wikipedia. And that assertion was the less humiliating that was used by the judges! The inventor ended up agreeing that gravimotion is incompatible with physics theories and under pressure had to delete the article himself. The whole debate is disclosed at: Gravimotion wikipedia deletion debate. Since Wikipedia articles may be modified at any time, and some of those who intervened might want to erase their own writing, the inventor kept a cache (a copy dated Aug 27 2007) of the debate. There is a good side to that controversy though! The inventor is now prepared! The inventor learned a lesson; face to face with gravimotion, some among the physicists drop their alleged objectivity and turn themselves into implacable judges. The inventor rebuttal is a question:
How would those physicists who also claim that their irrational conclusions don't make sense could endorse Gravimotion that does makes sense?
|