|
Please forgive, when awkward, the English of this page. English is not the author's native language. For French translation, click:
![]() An analogy for space time curvature.
The sun stretches its surrounding space just as a child stretches the fabric of a trampoline.Then earth's motion is guided by the sun's space-time curvature just as a marble is by the trampoline. Even though the analogy is colorful, its physical reality doesn't match the reality of the solar system. Both child and marble make physical contact with the trampoline's curvature; and the interactions that are occurring on the trampoline make sense. By contrast sun and earth are in contact with nothing. How could there be any interaction between non-material space-time (or nothing) and material mass? Hidden in the analogy is a precious clue though.The constituents in the analogy are all of same nature, all are physical and all are made of material mass.By contrast in the solar-system, space-time is immaterial while earth's mass is material! Introducing an innovative yet pragmatic idea.The innovation consists of a drastic declaration as expressed in paragraph 2 below:
Making abstraction of the abstract in favor of the physical.Somehow, one's mind to start with, is reluctant to the idea that motion is what makes the earth turn around the sun and that motion is what makes objects fall!That can't be! That's too simple! That's childish! There is no force in motion! It goes against physics fundamental tenets etc... Somehow one's mind does not consider motion that one's eyes see! Somehow one's mind prefers to consider this complex chain of events: mass creates force (or space-time curvature), and force (or space time curvature) moves mass, rather than considering only that one word "moves" that happens to summarize all that happens in reality! Just acknowledge the evidence: one sees motion, one doesn't see space, doesn't see time, let alone space time curvature! Both Newton's force of gravity and Einstein's space time curvature, in spite of their universality, are nevertheless abstract concepts with respect to motion. All in all this author favors to base its own description of gravitation on the tangible entity of motion rather than on hypothetical space, time and alleged curvature! The word gravimotion, merging gravitation into motion synthesizes both the language and the reality it represents. And this is only the tip of the iceberg, there is much more in the concept of gravimotion... find out for yourself get the book pictured here. Footnote: here are 2 examples of motion interacting on motion
|